Skip to main content

Meta cognition ( thinking about one’s thinking) and human limitations:



( these are merely self researched musings)
—————————————————————
“A key element is recognizing the limit of one’s knowledge or ability and then figuring out how to expand that knowledge or extend the ability. Those who know their strengths and weaknesses in these areas will be more likely to “actively monitor their learning strategies and resources and assess their readiness for particular tasks and performances” (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, p. 67).
I read this in an article and it stated that meta cognitive processes ( Metacognition includes a critical awareness of a) one’s thinking and learning and b) oneself as a thinker and learner) enable people to realise the limitations of their knowledge or ability and then expand upon it.
This got me thinking on how often do we think about how we think and whether thinking faithfully would differ from thinking faithlessly.
Which of course led my mind to wander through all the fiqhi debates I had read on different topics of my faith Islam.
Fiqh by the way is also a somewhat refined meta cognitive process to ponder, reflect and deduct rulings from the Quran and hadeeth. I don’t have any extensive knowledge of fiqh but as far as I have understood the process by reading from secondary sources debating on the practice and understanding of fiqhi experts. The most significant of all aspects in the process that became obvious was this key element mentioned above.
The intellectual humility to accept ones limitation.
This acknowledgment in fiqh has reason embedded purely in faith. Muslim jurists used to take brave decisions not because they always knew but mostly because they understood that they cannot know everything and they have to utlise with faith and tawakul only what they have understood.
This is significant because intellectual humility in different jurists resulted in different approaches.
1. One approach brought flexibility. Flexibility in practice due to the unrelenting contexts.
2. The other approach brought rigidity. Rigidity in practice due to the same unrelenting contexts.
Whatever the reason for these differences which are already quite well researched and stated in various textual sources. The point for me was to understand which approach helped the jurists to be more progressive.
What was progressive to them?
Was it different from what we define as progressive?
How different are our definitions?
What guided their definitions?
What guides ours?
Still in search. 🙂
Saima Sher Fazal

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the Concept of haya and hijab in Islam.

THE COAL MINE OR THE STAR STUDDED SKY:                                                                                                                        Every deen has an innate character. The character of islam is modesty.” Al Muwatta 47.9 The mania of emancipating the Pakistan woman from the “alleged restraints “of religion and custom seems to increase with every passing day. The solution it seems, for our liberalists is quite easy. Complete denial of everything the least bit religious, be it the most logical and correct mode of behavior but since that is what religion demands, it has to be done away with! Everything which was good and simple is now orthodox and impractical. Modesty is no more considered a virtue with most of the Pakistani gentility. Modest men and women are becoming an endangered species. This fashionable disease of abhorring all that is good, simple and virtuous is spreading at such an alarming rate that even the middle and lower classes are catching i
1 comment
Read more

ON RESPONSIBILITY!

The seemingly inconsequential fly buzzed around incessantly from one nose to another. Some were totally oblivious to its existence, Some bore its buzzing with a somewhat irritated expression while others shooed it away with a wave of their hand. Eventually,  it dived into a teacup. All hell broke loose. “Who let the fly in?”, “What a mess”, “Such a crappy building”, “Who left the window open?” “Who opened the window?”, “Why can’t you put a lid on your cup?”, “Why don’t we have fly screens for these doors and windows?”, “Why don’t we have a fly repellent?” A guy sitting on the far end folded his magazine and squatted the fly as soon as it landed on his desktop. That was ‘The End’ for the fly. (inspired from a real-life scene) We can roughly categorise the two kinds of behaviours/personalities described in the scenario above as ‘reactive’ and ‘proactive’. Out of these two our people fall into the ‘reactive’ category. A nation of reactive individuals who are not willing to tak
Post a Comment
Read more

The truth unveiled!

VALENTINE’S DAY The truth unveiled 'Every deen has an innate character. The character of Islam is modesty.' Al Muwatta 47.9 HOW IT STARTED: Like most Christian festivals, the origin of Valentine’s Day also lies in the pagan Rome. In ancient Rome young men and women used to celebrate this festival where the women would write love letters and throw them in a huge pot. Then the men would choose their partners through lottery and would court (relationship before marriage) the girl whose letter came in their hands. (Webster’s family encyclopedia). According to the encyclopedia this festival has no direct or indirect link to the life of Saint Valentine (269 A.D). To make Christianity more popular and acceptable among the pagan masses, the Christian clergy added this festival to Christianity by celebrating this day as Saint Valentine’s Day. The myths regarding Saint Valentine giving his life for the sake of love and others are all false. WHERE DO WE ST
3 comments
Read more