Skip to main content

Meta cognition ( thinking about one’s thinking) and human limitations:



( these are merely self researched musings)
—————————————————————
“A key element is recognizing the limit of one’s knowledge or ability and then figuring out how to expand that knowledge or extend the ability. Those who know their strengths and weaknesses in these areas will be more likely to “actively monitor their learning strategies and resources and assess their readiness for particular tasks and performances” (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, p. 67).
I read this in an article and it stated that meta cognitive processes ( Metacognition includes a critical awareness of a) one’s thinking and learning and b) oneself as a thinker and learner) enable people to realise the limitations of their knowledge or ability and then expand upon it.
This got me thinking on how often do we think about how we think and whether thinking faithfully would differ from thinking faithlessly.
Which of course led my mind to wander through all the fiqhi debates I had read on different topics of my faith Islam.
Fiqh by the way is also a somewhat refined meta cognitive process to ponder, reflect and deduct rulings from the Quran and hadeeth. I don’t have any extensive knowledge of fiqh but as far as I have understood the process by reading from secondary sources debating on the practice and understanding of fiqhi experts. The most significant of all aspects in the process that became obvious was this key element mentioned above.
The intellectual humility to accept ones limitation.
This acknowledgment in fiqh has reason embedded purely in faith. Muslim jurists used to take brave decisions not because they always knew but mostly because they understood that they cannot know everything and they have to utlise with faith and tawakul only what they have understood.
This is significant because intellectual humility in different jurists resulted in different approaches.
1. One approach brought flexibility. Flexibility in practice due to the unrelenting contexts.
2. The other approach brought rigidity. Rigidity in practice due to the same unrelenting contexts.
Whatever the reason for these differences which are already quite well researched and stated in various textual sources. The point for me was to understand which approach helped the jurists to be more progressive.
What was progressive to them?
Was it different from what we define as progressive?
How different are our definitions?
What guided their definitions?
What guides ours?
Still in search. 🙂
Saima Sher Fazal

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Raising strong Muslims.

A mother's quest: These are trying times for the Muslim ummah. Raising Muslim children in this age of fitan is not an easy task, especially when the fitan is of bloodshed and confusion. Unfortunately, being a Muslim is not that simple anymore. War and economic deterioration has made it difficult to follow Islam even in Muslim countries while many different issues have made it difficult in the West. This makes a parent’s job harder than ever.  The relationship between child and parent, is such that the choices we make for our children can be decisive in building their character. Since these are times when the Muslim ummah is in need of strong and productive people more than ever, what better way to do that than to raise children with strong characters filled with iman, tolerance, integrity and patience? We need to remember that children are a trust as well as a trial from Allah (subhanahu wa ta’la) for their parents in particular and society at large. They are...

آسان لفظوں میں:

جدید   قومی   ریاست   اور   فریج    جدید   دور   کے   ٹیکنالوجکل   ڈٹرنزم  (technological determinism)  میں   فریج   کی   اہمیت   پر   غور   و   فکر   کیا   جائے   تو   کچھ   عجب   نا   ہوگا۔   یہ فریج   ایک   گھر   کی   معیشت،   معاشرت   اور   سیاست   تینوں   جہتوں   میں     ایک   موثر   کردار   ادا   کرتا   ہے۔  (  یقین   نا   آئے   تو   محلے   کی   باجی   سے رجوع   کریں ) کچن   میں   رکھا   جائے   تو   اپنی   مدد   آپ   اسکیم،   ڈرائینگ   روم   یاکامن   روم   میں   رکھ   دیا   جائے   تو   جاسوسی   مہم،   سونے   والے   کمروں   کی راہدری   میں   تو     معاشی   مفاہمت   اور ...

آسان لفظوں میں:

حکومت کا ای وی ایم مشینز کے بارے میں قوم اور اپوزیشن کو یہ یقین دہانی کرانا کہ بھئی جس کا کنکیشن ہی نہیں کسی اینٹرنیٹ سے "وہ ہیک کیسے ہوسکتا ہے؟" اور اپوزیشن کو یہ نیک مشورہ کہ آپ اب "دھاندلی کے نئے طریقے ڈھونڈھیں" عین ہمارے قومی تشخص کی عکاسی ہے۔ جمہوریت کا ایسا فہم کم ہی قوموں کو نصیب ہوتا ہے۔  سوچنے کی بات یہ ہے کہ جن ملکوں کی مثالیں دی جارہی ہیں ای وی ایم مشینز کے لیے وہاں پر ایلکٹورل شفافیت کا یہ عالم کیا محض مشینوں کی وجہ سے ہے؟ کیا وہ مشینیں اُنھوں نے لوگوں کی تعلیم و تربیت اور اُن کے استعمال میں شامل حقوق و فرائض سے آگاہ کرکے لگائیں کہ سمارٹ فون یوزیج والے مزدور کو کارپوریٹ مکاریوں پر آگاہ سمجھ کر مسلط کر دیں گئیں؟  ابھی حال ہی میں ایک ڈیجیٹل ایرر کی وجہ سے بنک میں رقم زیادہ ہوگئی۔ چار دن کی تکرار کے بعد جا کر وہ ایرر ڈیٹکیٹ ہوا۔ اور رقم واپس ہوئی۔ جس سے فون پر بات کرو وہ صفائی پیش کرنے میں مصروف ہے۔ یہ کوئی نہیں سوچ رہا کہ شکایت ، اعتراض یا تنقید ہمیشہ دشمنی میں ہی نہیں ہوتی اور یہ کہ اس کو شفافیت سے حل کرنے کے لیئے پہلا قدم اعتراف ہے۔ حکومت اس بات کا اع...