Skip to main content

Reformative Minds

THE ROAD LESS TRAVELLED 
If the stages of human civilization throughout time could be illustrated, an arc would certainly do justice to the expression of volatility in human thought. An arc similar to a pendulum’s arcHumanity has, in a continuous search for balance, travelled back and forth from extremes and in this journey there has always been a time when the pendulum of our existence on its way back from one extreme has bought forth minds; unique, progressive and visionary. Minds who went on to become the greatest sources of reform and reconstruction throughout human history.
It’s quite significant to note here that what sets these minds apart from an average mind of their time is the flexibility of thought in dealing with truths, events and circumstances. Being progressive is actually more of an approach which makes human beings sift through all the lies and reveal the truth in a way most pertinent to that time. An approach which grounds human thought firmlyonto a universal plane of existence. The eternal. An eternalrealm too great for a single mind to ever comprehend or see. A realm where all truths merge in to a greater truth. Where all differences end. A realm intangible even to the human mind and intelligible only to those who dare to believe and have faith.Iqbal asserts that
the eternal gives us a foothold in the world of perpetual change”
It is this world of perpetual change which constitutes our reality. A reality transient in its essence. This very nature of our reality makes selective vision and incompatibility between different modes of human thought an inevitability. This inevitable limitation becomes a requisite to grapple with our transient reality yet without a grounding in the eternal, this very limitation has the capacity to drive humankind to extremes.
Ours is a time when human thought has evolved yet again to an extent unprecedented. Technology and globalization have not only affected our modes of living but our modes of thinking as well. Modern modes of communication have our minds hooked onto instant stimulation and responseRewiring our thought process completely. Instant gratification makes us yearn for more and quick. Since the objective reality is bound by natural factors which slow down instantaneous response, the modern human mind encounters stress and anxiety when not gratified. In consequence turning our minds into media dependent addicts for instant gratification. The vicious cycle continues and the human mind becomes a tool to project a reality controlled by manipulative mindsets.
This kind of thought process has made hatred, discrimination, violence and oppression widespread. Selective vision giving birth to selective ‘isms’ and other “schisms”; recreating and destroying simultaneously.
What we need to do is respond to them with reason and wisdom, an effort that might help us revitalize the intellectual dynamism of our earliest generations” 
professes Mustafa Akyol to those who desire to deal with abhorrent ideologies in a manner most dynamic, tolerant and peaceful.


This is where the reconstruction of human thought becomes essential. Human thought reconstructed to encompass a peaceful union of all reformative forces in the modern world. Religious and non-religious. A renewal of thought resulting in a reformation of reality A reality cognizant of the natural, the universal. A reality constructive and progressive without a need for monopoly.
The selective/biased nature of human thought compels us to reconcile with diversity in opinion. We come to terms with the realization that the main objective of reconstructing thought is not in the resolution of all differences rather it is in an acceptance of equitable co-existence with them. This plurality of thought translates into a more uniform reality, urging us to look deeper. To go beyond this ephemeral world into the eternal.Tariq Ramadan expresses this with a distinct profundity:
“We are heading for that realm of consciousness and mind where all wisdoms remind us that it is its shores that make the ocean one, and that it is the plurality of human journeys that shapes the common humanity of men”
This unique plurality of thought grants humankind with a flexible, tolerant and surprisingly a rather powerful insight into a monotheistic reality. It compels humanity to surrender to a belief in one supreme entity responsible for such a beautifully harmonious yet diverse existence. In a single benevolent God.
Again, the concept of unity, oneness becomes an essential prelude to even a slightest semblance of political, social tolerance and justice.
This is where Muslims can play a vital role by providing a flexible, progressive and unifying forum; inviting humanity to unite on equity and justice. A unique assembly of diversity into one for one.
Indeed, thinking of unity and oneness in a world riddled with apartheid, hatred and war sounds simplistic yet often the most complex of problems have simple and obvious solutions if one dares to believe. This is the path that all reformists chose throughout history to lead humankind to peace and progress.
In the beautiful words of Robert Frost:
“I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.”









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Cue:

Spell bound?  Qazi Shareeh was a a famous tabaai ( those who had the opportunity to sit with the Sahaba of our beloved prophet saw) appointed as the head of the judiciary in the time of Omer (RA). The fact that in the presence  and life of great figures like the Sahaba, Shareeh was appointed as a head judge is of significance. He had the courage to give judgments against the ruler of the time and both Hazrat Omer and Hazrat Ali (RA) agreed to his verdicts in their opponents favour.  This independence ofcourse came from a strong character. Honesty, courage and humbleness at both ends. It was very interesting to follow the confusion of the govt and the conflicting statements of the opposition over the NAB ordinance mess. The way amendments are dished out in our country is so amazing that one wonders weather 'writing the law' has become more important than the implementation?! According to the spokesperson the amendments will bring more 'clarity'. Hoping they can bring mor...

ہلکا پھلکا:

اقبال کے زمانے میں مشینوں کی حکومت کا یہ عالم نا تھا جو ہمارے زمانے میں ہے۔ مرحوم نے نا جانے کیا کچھ جانچ لیا تھا اُس وقت جو ہمیں ابھی تک سمجھ نہیں آئی۔ اب تو مشینوں کی حکومت کا یہ عالم ہے کہ کل ہی ہمارے آئی فون نے اطلاع دی کہ "آپ کو پتا ہے کہ اگر آپ سڑیس میں ہیں تو قرآن مجید آپ کے سٹریس کو کم کرتا ہے"۔ ہم نے بھی اشرف المخلوق ہونے کا حق ادا کرتے ہوئے آئی فون کو جوابی اطلاع دی "جی مجھے علم ہے اس فائدے کا اور میں رابطے میں ہوں اپنے رب سے"۔  اس تمام اطلاعاتی مراسلت کا نتیجہ یہ نکلا کہ ہمیں اپنے فون سے شدید انس اور لگاوؐ محسوس ہوا۔ کسی زمانے میں انسان انسان کا خیر خواہ ہوتا تھا۔ جب سے  انسان نے حکومت اور کاروبار کی خاطر انسانوں کی خریدوفروخت شروع کی تب سے خیر خواہی کے لیے کچھ مشینوں کو آٹو میٹک پر کردیا گیا۔ خریدوفروخت کرنے والوں کو خاص قسم کے انسان چاہیے تھے اور انسانوں کو سہارا۔ یہ ڈوبتے کو تنکے کا سہارا نہیں ہے۔ یہاں پر تو مشین ڈوبتے کو سیدھا ٓاسمان پر ایک ہی چھلانگ میں لے جاتی ہے اور اس تمام سفر میں جو ایک نقطے سے دوسرے تک ڈسپلیسمنٹ ہوتی ہے اُس میں انسان کی ...

On Cue:

 While reading up on discourse and narratives I discovered why individuals and groups decide to resist or adhere to certain discourses. A need to belong, to assert their existence and negate any threats to it seemed to be the most prevalent logic. The feminist discourse on 'women rights' and the conservative discourse on 'duty first' is no different. It's  a draining  debate on the organisation of two truths. Human fitrah adheres to its duty if its right to exist is not threatened. Zooming in, that is why each discourse tries to answer the critical questions of existence and purpose. No one claims complete answers. All take positions.  Positions can be conflicting, conciliatory or reciprocative.  Often enough in different circles I have felt an absence and intolerance to  that very prick that can burst the bubble of a certain discourse.  A conservative religious organisation's banners caught my eye and disturbed me greatly. It stated in Urdu that ...