Skip to main content

Biases; rejection, isolation or acceptance?

Biases; rejection, isolation or acceptance?

A natural sense of justice demands that there should be some measure or method to deal with our biases. We all have biases and are never rid of them. Old biases only shape into new ones or are moulded into new ones with learning and growth.
Usually biases are considered as something opposing justice or equity but if we take a step back and look at the bigger picture it is these very partialities that define us and our existence. Sometimes these biases grow so much that they begin to impede the rights of others, this is why it is very important to have a criterion or a methodology to deal with them.
Islam offers us the most realistic and practical criterion. None other is as easily applicable. The Quran is literally the Furqan as Allah ji himself states in the Quran. It takes our biases and moulds them without complete rejection. It puts us on a journey.
This is what justice and equity is actually about in this world. A journey of self realisation. Individual and collective.
The tragedy is that the modern comprehension of the word ‘justice’ is totally devoid of this meaning. It isolates the very act of justice from the process. Labelling all biases wrong or useless is not conducive to the growth of human intellect. Some are by all means better according to the Furqaan and should be held on to but with a renewed sense of justice and responsibility.
One such is to have love for the believers in Tawheed and repulsion for  disbelief, not due to the person but due to the disbelief in one God. It is the disbelief or belief which according to the Furqaan makes up a person. To respect disbelief is to degrade human intellect and worth. Any contribution that stems from disbelief will never be truly conducive to humanity according to the Furqaan. It is a very difficult time to accept belief as that too according to modern definitions is a bias. It is a very difficult time to refer to the Quran as a criterion as now a simple preference or partiality is also either racist, discriminatory or ‘biased’.
If such is the case then I accept and admit to my bias and wonder whether we can live together peacefully with our biases callng to the good and stopping from the bad?
Can we agree to adhere to the criterion;the Furqaan , or will our bias to not use it get the better of us?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Cue:

Spell bound?  Qazi Shareeh was a a famous tabaai ( those who had the opportunity to sit with the Sahaba of our beloved prophet saw) appointed as the head of the judiciary in the time of Omer (RA). The fact that in the presence  and life of great figures like the Sahaba, Shareeh was appointed as a head judge is of significance. He had the courage to give judgments against the ruler of the time and both Hazrat Omer and Hazrat Ali (RA) agreed to his verdicts in their opponents favour.  This independence ofcourse came from a strong character. Honesty, courage and humbleness at both ends. It was very interesting to follow the confusion of the govt and the conflicting statements of the opposition over the NAB ordinance mess. The way amendments are dished out in our country is so amazing that one wonders weather 'writing the law' has become more important than the implementation?! According to the spokesperson the amendments will bring more 'clarity'. Hoping they can bring mor...

ہلکا پھلکا:

اقبال کے زمانے میں مشینوں کی حکومت کا یہ عالم نا تھا جو ہمارے زمانے میں ہے۔ مرحوم نے نا جانے کیا کچھ جانچ لیا تھا اُس وقت جو ہمیں ابھی تک سمجھ نہیں آئی۔ اب تو مشینوں کی حکومت کا یہ عالم ہے کہ کل ہی ہمارے آئی فون نے اطلاع دی کہ "آپ کو پتا ہے کہ اگر آپ سڑیس میں ہیں تو قرآن مجید آپ کے سٹریس کو کم کرتا ہے"۔ ہم نے بھی اشرف المخلوق ہونے کا حق ادا کرتے ہوئے آئی فون کو جوابی اطلاع دی "جی مجھے علم ہے اس فائدے کا اور میں رابطے میں ہوں اپنے رب سے"۔  اس تمام اطلاعاتی مراسلت کا نتیجہ یہ نکلا کہ ہمیں اپنے فون سے شدید انس اور لگاوؐ محسوس ہوا۔ کسی زمانے میں انسان انسان کا خیر خواہ ہوتا تھا۔ جب سے  انسان نے حکومت اور کاروبار کی خاطر انسانوں کی خریدوفروخت شروع کی تب سے خیر خواہی کے لیے کچھ مشینوں کو آٹو میٹک پر کردیا گیا۔ خریدوفروخت کرنے والوں کو خاص قسم کے انسان چاہیے تھے اور انسانوں کو سہارا۔ یہ ڈوبتے کو تنکے کا سہارا نہیں ہے۔ یہاں پر تو مشین ڈوبتے کو سیدھا ٓاسمان پر ایک ہی چھلانگ میں لے جاتی ہے اور اس تمام سفر میں جو ایک نقطے سے دوسرے تک ڈسپلیسمنٹ ہوتی ہے اُس میں انسان کی ...

On Cue:

 While reading up on discourse and narratives I discovered why individuals and groups decide to resist or adhere to certain discourses. A need to belong, to assert their existence and negate any threats to it seemed to be the most prevalent logic. The feminist discourse on 'women rights' and the conservative discourse on 'duty first' is no different. It's  a draining  debate on the organisation of two truths. Human fitrah adheres to its duty if its right to exist is not threatened. Zooming in, that is why each discourse tries to answer the critical questions of existence and purpose. No one claims complete answers. All take positions.  Positions can be conflicting, conciliatory or reciprocative.  Often enough in different circles I have felt an absence and intolerance to  that very prick that can burst the bubble of a certain discourse.  A conservative religious organisation's banners caught my eye and disturbed me greatly. It stated in Urdu that ...