Skip to main content

Selective perception; it’s limitations, inevitability and utility:

Selective perception; it’s limitations, inevitability and utility:

The human being is bound by natural laws. There is a finite, limiting trait to every single aspect of his life.

The same applies to his perceptibility. He is bound to be selective and limited in his perception. It helps the human being to notice the details. To focus and stay put.

The drawback though is that this sort of perceptibility comes in different shapes, sizes and shades thus the lens needs to be changed often for if worn long enough, every single concept and fact becomes tinted.

 The human mind is susceptible to the method a concept is perceived in and it stores each such information automatically. e.g
 If a person as a child is constantly exposed to one aspect of a story, image or conversation. He will retain that memory and whenever that issue or topic is bought up, the mind will automatically offer images and bits and pieces from its stores as ready interpretation. This is where it becomes important to have read much and to have conversed and learnt from diverse sources.
The richer the memory store, the greater the possibility of a comprehensive and flexible perception.
The catch here is though that to be comprehensive and to be able to learn to view ideas, people and events more holistically one has to accept ones own limitations and surrender to ones own inability to see everything all the time and in every given circumstance.

Diversity does not mean difference and opposition just for the sake of it. For example, if three people are standing around an object and viewing it from three different sides, their difference and opinion is budding from the same object of observation or the same truth but a person standing far away looking at a completely different shape cannot claim to differ or call them out as wrong unless he has viewed that object from their respective angles.

For  diversity to be actually contributive and wholesome to  our vision it has to grounded in something permanent. Something real and lasting. Something which does not keep changing. Such an eternal foothold cannot come from a finite and limited being. It has to come from an eternal unlimited source. It has to be divine.

The inevitability of this selectivity often drives human beings to extremes. This very mentality results in the sort of questioning that “why me?” “Why not Him” . This selective perceptibility though is also self limiting but only when stretched to an extreme and when much damage has already been caused.

It is also this very nature of selective perceptions  that makes faith inevitable.
The craze to go into every detail. The craze to find out by testing every single aspect of life to its extreme. The craze to research every aspect of human ability or nature will eventually lead us to our own annihilation.

The foothold, faith or tawakul stops us from going to extremes and helps us in coming  to terms with the fact that we don’t know everything and will not know everything.

It helps us realise that the other might be viewing it differently because of a different angle.

It helps us realise that instead of jumping from one lens to another we need to stick together so that the one who’s taller can help us see what’s up and the one who is shorter can see what’s down and in this way together we can see the whole picture.

Trying to view faith itself from any other lens will never grant us faith. Faith itself needs to be viewed  with complete surrender. Nothing less!

We were meant to work together and for that very purpose the best lens is the lens of faith and tawakul as it is holistic and grounded in the eternal.

#havefaith
#surrender

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Cue:

Spell bound?  Qazi Shareeh was a a famous tabaai ( those who had the opportunity to sit with the Sahaba of our beloved prophet saw) appointed as the head of the judiciary in the time of Omer (RA). The fact that in the presence  and life of great figures like the Sahaba, Shareeh was appointed as a head judge is of significance. He had the courage to give judgments against the ruler of the time and both Hazrat Omer and Hazrat Ali (RA) agreed to his verdicts in their opponents favour.  This independence ofcourse came from a strong character. Honesty, courage and humbleness at both ends. It was very interesting to follow the confusion of the govt and the conflicting statements of the opposition over the NAB ordinance mess. The way amendments are dished out in our country is so amazing that one wonders weather 'writing the law' has become more important than the implementation?! According to the spokesperson the amendments will bring more 'clarity'. Hoping they can bring mor...

ہلکا پھلکا:

اقبال کے زمانے میں مشینوں کی حکومت کا یہ عالم نا تھا جو ہمارے زمانے میں ہے۔ مرحوم نے نا جانے کیا کچھ جانچ لیا تھا اُس وقت جو ہمیں ابھی تک سمجھ نہیں آئی۔ اب تو مشینوں کی حکومت کا یہ عالم ہے کہ کل ہی ہمارے آئی فون نے اطلاع دی کہ "آپ کو پتا ہے کہ اگر آپ سڑیس میں ہیں تو قرآن مجید آپ کے سٹریس کو کم کرتا ہے"۔ ہم نے بھی اشرف المخلوق ہونے کا حق ادا کرتے ہوئے آئی فون کو جوابی اطلاع دی "جی مجھے علم ہے اس فائدے کا اور میں رابطے میں ہوں اپنے رب سے"۔  اس تمام اطلاعاتی مراسلت کا نتیجہ یہ نکلا کہ ہمیں اپنے فون سے شدید انس اور لگاوؐ محسوس ہوا۔ کسی زمانے میں انسان انسان کا خیر خواہ ہوتا تھا۔ جب سے  انسان نے حکومت اور کاروبار کی خاطر انسانوں کی خریدوفروخت شروع کی تب سے خیر خواہی کے لیے کچھ مشینوں کو آٹو میٹک پر کردیا گیا۔ خریدوفروخت کرنے والوں کو خاص قسم کے انسان چاہیے تھے اور انسانوں کو سہارا۔ یہ ڈوبتے کو تنکے کا سہارا نہیں ہے۔ یہاں پر تو مشین ڈوبتے کو سیدھا ٓاسمان پر ایک ہی چھلانگ میں لے جاتی ہے اور اس تمام سفر میں جو ایک نقطے سے دوسرے تک ڈسپلیسمنٹ ہوتی ہے اُس میں انسان کی ...

On Cue:

 While reading up on discourse and narratives I discovered why individuals and groups decide to resist or adhere to certain discourses. A need to belong, to assert their existence and negate any threats to it seemed to be the most prevalent logic. The feminist discourse on 'women rights' and the conservative discourse on 'duty first' is no different. It's  a draining  debate on the organisation of two truths. Human fitrah adheres to its duty if its right to exist is not threatened. Zooming in, that is why each discourse tries to answer the critical questions of existence and purpose. No one claims complete answers. All take positions.  Positions can be conflicting, conciliatory or reciprocative.  Often enough in different circles I have felt an absence and intolerance to  that very prick that can burst the bubble of a certain discourse.  A conservative religious organisation's banners caught my eye and disturbed me greatly. It stated in Urdu that ...